Woods, LaFortune LLP

Navigation Menu

Considering International Trade Law – Indigenous Perspectives & Possibilities – March 19th at the University of Ottawa

Posted by on Feb 15, 2019

Michael Woods is scheduled to participate on a panel discussion on Indigenous perspectives and international trade law at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law on March 19, 2019. His participation reflects his ongoing involvement in the field as a member of the executive of the International Inter-tribal Trade and Investment Organization (IITIO) and the Global Affairs Canada Indigenous Working Group which advised the Government on Canada’s international trade agenda.  Michael will be joined by the Chair of IITIO, Wayne Garnons-Williams and he head of the Government  of Canada’s Trade Law Bureau, Robert Brookfield.  The organizers are encouraging members of the public to attend as this will be and open event. Lunch will be...

Read More

The Trade Law Division’s 25th Anniversary – Canada’s Public Service Excellence

Posted by on Jul 2, 2018

Both Gord LaFortune and Michael Woods had an opportunity to celebrate their trade law roots with over 150 old colleagues and a new generation trade lawyers as the Government of Canada’s Trade Law Davison celebrates its 25th anniversary on June 22, 2018. In 1993 the Department of External Affairs and International Trade (now Global Affairs Canada) and the Department of Justice (now Justice Canada) created the joint unit made up of lawyers from both departments was called the Trade Law Division with the acronym JLT. Its mandate was to counsel the Government of Canada on all aspects of international trade law. Both Gord and Michael were early members of JLT which has established itself as a model unit for legal advice, advocacy and litigation in international trade and investment law – a Canadian center of excellence in international trade and investment law. As former public servants we noted with pride that that Oxford’s Blavatnik School of Public Policy and the prestigious UK- based Institute for Government was recently rated as the world’s best public service. We congratulate both former colleagues who helped build the JLT and current hard working men and women who are maintaining...

Read More

I’d Cut Down Every Law in England… !

Posted by on Jun 1, 2018

It is almost that time of the year of for newly minted law graduates.  There are days when I reflect on the growth of the rule of law in the international context and its importance for order and justice in the world. This included international trade law.  But as we know the rule of law in this context remains vulnerable to local views and narrow national self-interest.   When I was called to the bar (many years ago) the great criminal lawyer and fighter for civil rights. Author Maloney QC, quoted from the play about Sir Thomas More – A Man for All Seasons by Richard Bolt. When Sir Thomas is threatened by Richard Rich – a man seen as dangerous man, his family urges him to take whatever means necessary to dispose of him. ROPER Arrest him. ALICE Yes! MORE For what? ALICE He’s dangerous! ROPER For libel; he’s a spy. ALICE He is! Arrest him! MARGARET Father, that man’s bad. MORE There is no law against that. ALICE (Exasperated, pointing after RICH) While you talk, he’s gone! MORE And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER So now you’d give the Devil benefit of law! MORE Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER I’d cut down every law in England to do that! MORE  Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country’s planted thick with laws from coast to coast — man’s laws, not God’s — and if you cut them down — and you’re just the man to do it — d’you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s...

Read More

Steel, Aluminum, and the WTO’s Pandora’s Box – Part III

Posted by on Jun 1, 2018

On May 31, 2018 the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross announced that the section 232 tariff on steel and the 10% tariff on aluminum would go into effect June 1st with respect to imports from Canada, the EU, and Mexico. All three had been give exceptions following the March  8th decision by the U.S. president to impose these measures pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act 1962 on the basis of national security concerns. For more details regarding the decision and the products covered see our earlier report –  http://www.wl-tradelaw.com/steel-aluminum-and-the-wtos-pandoras-box-part-ii/ and https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/entry-summary/232-tariffs-aluminum-and-steel Earlier this month the U.S. Administration announced the initiation of a section 232 investigation into the imports of auto on a global basis (including Canada and Mexico). Canada, the EU. and Mexico reacted quickly with plans to launch trade challenges (WTO, NAFTA) and to retaliate within the next several weeks.   For more details on Canada’s $16.6 Billion list of suggested products to be targeted (to be targeted commencing) July 1st ) see – https://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/consult/cacsap-cmpcaa-eng.asp  Note Canadian individuals and firms are invited to comment within the next 15 days. More to...

Read More

Steel, Aluminum, and the WTO’s Pandora’s Box – Part II

Posted by on Mar 12, 2018

On Thursday March 8th, President Trump followed through on his threat to impose tariffs on all of steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) on a global basis. The Proclamations on the two products are notable in that it aims to link the tariffs to the national security of the United States.  “The persistent threat of further closures of domestic steel production facilities and the “shrinking [of our] ability to meet national security production requirements in a national emergency.” This same rationale is used to justify exempting both Canada and Mexico.  As the Proclamation on steel sets out: Given our shared commitment to supporting each other in addressing national security concerns, our shared commitment to addressing global excess capacity for producing steel, the physical proximity of our respective industrial bases, the robust economic integration between our countries, the export of steel articles produced in the United States to Canada and Mexico, and the close relation of the economic welfare of the United States to our national security …  the necessary and appropriate means to address the threat to the national security posed by imports of steel articles from Canada and Mexico is to continue ongoing discussions with these countries and to exempt steel articles imports from these countries from the tariff, at least at this time.  I expect that Canada and Mexico will take action to prevent transshipment of steel articles through Canada and Mexico to the United States. However the President added an important caveat and linked the exemption to the ongoing NAFTA negotiation: Without this tariff and satisfactory outcomes in ongoing negotiations with Canada and Mexico, the  [aluminum and steel] industry will continue to decline, leaving the United States at risk of becoming reliant on foreign producers of steel to meet our national security needs — a situation that is fundamentally inconsistent with the safety and security of the American people …  Note that “steel articles” are defined at the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 6‑digit level as:  7206.10 through 7216.50, 7216.99 through 7301.10, 7302.10, 7302.40 through 7302.90, and 7304.10 through 7306.90, including any subsequent revisions to these HTS classifications. “Aluminum articles” are defined in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) as:...

Read More